This is the final sort being modified for this [epic][0]

This (sort-of) mirrors the work done in:

- [MR 154054][1] (added sorting based on `highest_severity`)
- [MR 154779][2] (added sorting based on `component_name`)
- [MR 154863][3] (added sorting based on `package_manager`)

Originally, the implementation plan of sorting by `license` called for
adding a new column to sort on.

In the MR to add the column, a reviewer [mentioned][4] we could use the
existing `jsonb` data for sorting.

This involves modifying the `AggregationsFinder` to be able to
generate SQL to use jsonb to access the first `spdx_identifier` in the
`licenses` column

[0]:https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/12371
[1]:https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/154054
[2]:https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/154779
[3]:https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/154863
[4]:https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/155072#note_1942448739

---

MR: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/155995
related to: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/450922
Changelog: added

drop unused DAST tables dast_site_profiles_pipelines and dast_scanner_profiles_tags

Changelog: removed
EE: true

## What does this MR do and why?

Add and backfill project_id for packages_debian_project_components.

This table has a
[desired sharding key](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/development/database/multiple_databases.html#define-a-desired_sharding_key-to-automatically-backfill-a-sharding_key)
configured ([view configuration](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/master/db/docs/packages_debian_project_components.yml)).

This merge request is the first step towards transforming the desired sharding key into a
[sharding key](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/development/database/multiple_databases.html#defining-a-sharding-key-for-all-cell-local-tables).

This involves three changes:

- Adding a new column that will serve as the sharding key (along with the relevant index and foreign key).
- Populating the sharding key when new records are created by adding a database function and trigger.
- Scheduling a [batched background migration](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/development/database/batched_background_migrations.html)
  to set the sharding key for existing records.

Once the background migration has completed, a second merge request will be created to finalize the background
migration and validate the not null constraint.

## How to verify

We have assigned a random backend engineer from ~"group::package registry" to review these changes. Please review this merge
request from a ~backend perspective. The main thing we are looking to verify is that the added column and association
match the values specified by the [desired sharding key](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/master/db/docs/packages_debian_project_components.yml)
configuration and that backfilling the column from this other table makes sense in the context of this feature.

When you are finished, please:

1. Trigger the [database testing pipeline](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/development/database/database_migration_pipeline.html)
   as instructed by Danger.
1. Request a review from the ~backend maintainer and ~database reviewer suggested by Danger.

If you have any questions or concerns, reach out to `@tigerwnz` or @manojmj.

This merge request was generated by a once off keep implemented in
https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/143774

This change was generated by
[gitlab-housekeeper](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/tree/master/gems/gitlab-housekeeper)
using the Keeps::BackfillDesiredShardingKeySmallTable keep.

To provide feedback on your experience with `gitlab-housekeeper` please comment in
<https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/442003>.

Changelog: other

This removes the ignored individual permission
columns from the member_roles table:

- admin_cicd_variables
- admin_group_member
- admin_merge_request
- admin_terraform_state
- admin_vulnerability
- archive_project
- manage_group_access_tokens
- manage_project_access_tokens
- read_code
- read_dependency
- read_vulnerability
- remove_group
- remove_project

Changelog: other

See
https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/156170#note_1969762468.

[skip-db-structure-check]

Co-authored-by: DANGER_GITLAB_API_TOKEN <project_278964_bot_445da1b60fc7336b6b6776383134d10f@noreply.gitlab.com>

## What does this MR do and why?

Add and backfill project_id for ml_candidate_metadata.

This table has a
[desired sharding key](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/development/database/multiple_databases.html#define-a-desired_sharding_key-to-automatically-backfill-a-sharding_key)
configured ([view configuration](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/master/db/docs/ml_candidate_metadata.yml)).

This merge request is the first step towards transforming the desired sharding key into a
[sharding key](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/development/database/multiple_databases.html#defining-a-sharding-key-for-all-cell-local-tables).

This involves three changes:

- Adding a new column that will serve as the sharding key (along with the relevant index and foreign key).
- Populating the sharding key when new records are created by adding a database function and trigger.
- Scheduling a [batched background migration](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/development/database/batched_background_migrations.html)
  to set the sharding key for existing records.

Once the background migration has completed, a second merge request will be created to finalize the background
migration and validate the not null constraint.

## How to verify

We have assigned a random backend engineer from ~"group::mlops" to review these changes. Please review this merge
request from a ~backend perspective. The main thing we are looking to verify is that the added column and association
match the values specified by the [desired sharding key](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/master/db/docs/ml_candidate_metadata.yml)
configuration and that backfilling the column from this other table makes sense in the context of this feature.

When you are finished, please:

1. Trigger the [database testing pipeline](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/development/database/database_migration_pipeline.html)
   as instructed by Danger.
1. Request a review from the ~backend maintainer and ~database reviewer suggested by Danger.

If you have any questions or concerns, reach out to `@tigerwnz` or @manojmj.

This merge request was generated by a once off keep implemented in
https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/143774

This change was generated by
[gitlab-housekeeper](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/tree/master/gems/gitlab-housekeeper)
using the Keeps::BackfillDesiredShardingKeySmallTable keep.

To provide feedback on your experience with `gitlab-housekeeper` please comment in
<https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/442003>.

Changelog: other

## What does this MR do and why?

Add and backfill project_id for packages_dependency_links.

This table has a
[desired sharding key](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/development/database/multiple_databases.html#define-a-desired_sharding_key-to-automatically-backfill-a-sharding_key)
configured ([view configuration](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/master/db/docs/packages_dependency_links.yml)).

This merge request is the first step towards transforming the desired sharding key into a
[sharding key](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/development/database/multiple_databases.html#defining-a-sharding-key-for-all-cell-local-tables).

This involves three changes:

- Adding a new column that will serve as the sharding key (along with the relevant index and foreign key).
- Populating the sharding key when new records are created by adding a database function and trigger.
- Scheduling a [batched background migration](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/development/database/batched_background_migrations.html)
  to set the sharding key for existing records.

Once the background migration has completed, a second merge request will be created to finalize the background
migration and validate the not null constraint.

## How to verify

We have assigned a random backend engineer from ~"group::package registry" to review these changes. Please review this merge
request from a ~backend perspective. The main thing we are looking to verify is that the added column and association
match the values specified by the [desired sharding key](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/master/db/docs/packages_dependency_links.yml)
configuration and that backfilling the column from this other table makes sense in the context of this feature.

When you are finished, please:

1. Trigger the [database testing pipeline](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/development/database/database_migration_pipeline.html)
   as instructed by Danger.
1. Request a review from the ~backend maintainer and ~database reviewer suggested by Danger.

If you have any questions or concerns, reach out to `@tigerwnz` or @manojmj.

This merge request was generated by a once off keep implemented in
https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/143774

This change was generated by
[gitlab-housekeeper](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/tree/master/gems/gitlab-housekeeper)
using the Keeps::BackfillDesiredShardingKeySmallTable keep.

To provide feedback on your experience with `gitlab-housekeeper` please comment in
<https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/442003>.

Changelog: other

Adds NOT NULL constraint on namespace_id on
gitlab_subscription_histories table

Adds sharding-key for gitlab_subscription_histories

EE: true
Changelog: other

In order to shard merge_request_context_commits on project_id, we need
to retrieve the associated project from its related merge request. By
not having this column as NOT NULL we're unable to use
desired_sharding_key to automatically backfill this table.

Changelog: added

Merge branch 'security-retarget-no-pipeline' into 'master'

See merge request gitlab-org/security/gitlab!4113

Changelog: security

## What does this MR do and why?

Add and backfill project_id for ml_model_metadata.

This table has a
[desired sharding key](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/development/database/multiple_databases.html#define-a-desired_sharding_key-to-automatically-backfill-a-sharding_key)
configured ([view configuration](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/master/db/docs/ml_model_metadata.yml)).

This merge request is the first step towards transforming the desired sharding key into a
[sharding key](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/development/database/multiple_databases.html#defining-a-sharding-key-for-all-cell-local-tables).

This involves three changes:

- Adding a new column that will serve as the sharding key (along with the relevant index and foreign key).
- Populating the sharding key when new records are created by adding a database function and trigger.
- Scheduling a [batched background migration](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/development/database/batched_background_migrations.html)
  to set the sharding key for existing records.

Once the background migration has completed, a second merge request will be created to finalize the background
migration and validate the not null constraint.

## How to verify

We have assigned a random backend engineer from ~"group::mlops" to review these changes. Please review this merge
request from a ~backend perspective. The main thing we are looking to verify is that the added column and association
match the values specified by the [desired sharding key](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/master/db/docs/ml_model_metadata.yml)
configuration and that backfilling the column from this other table makes sense in the context of this feature.

When you are finished, please:

1. Trigger the [database testing pipeline](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/development/database/database_migration_pipeline.html)
   as instructed by Danger.
1. Request a review from the ~backend maintainer and ~database reviewer suggested by Danger.

If you have any questions or concerns, reach out to `@tigerwnz` or @manojmj.

This merge request was generated by a once off keep implemented in
https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/143774

This change was generated by
[gitlab-housekeeper](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/tree/master/gems/gitlab-housekeeper)
using the Keeps::BackfillDesiredShardingKeySmallTable keep.

To provide feedback on your experience with `gitlab-housekeeper` please comment in
<https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/442003>.

Changelog: other

Changelog: changed

## What does this MR do and why?

Add and backfill project_id for merge_requests_closing_issues.

This table has a
[desired sharding key](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/development/database/multiple_databases.html#define-a-desired_sharding_key-to-automatically-backfill-a-sharding_key)
configured ([view configuration](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/master/db/docs/merge_requests_closing_issues.yml)).

This merge request is the first step towards transforming the desired sharding key into a
[sharding key](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/development/database/multiple_databases.html#defining-a-sharding-key-for-all-cell-local-tables).

This involves three changes:

- Adding a new column that will serve as the sharding key (along with the relevant index and foreign key).
- Populating the sharding key when new records are created by adding a database function and trigger.
- Scheduling a [batched background migration](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/development/database/batched_background_migrations.html)
  to set the sharding key for existing records.

Once the background migration has completed, a second merge request will be created to finalize the background
migration and validate the not null constraint.

## How to verify

We have assigned a random backend engineer from ~"group::code review" to review these changes. Please review this merge
request from a ~backend perspective. The main thing we are looking to verify is that the added column and association
match the values specified by the [desired sharding key](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/master/db/docs/merge_requests_closing_issues.yml)
configuration and that backfilling the column from this other table makes sense in the context of this feature.

When you are finished, please:

1. Trigger the [database testing pipeline](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/development/database/database_migration_pipeline.html)
   as instructed by Danger.
1. Request a review from the ~backend maintainer and ~database reviewer suggested by Danger.

If you have any questions or concerns, reach out to `@tigerwnz` or @manojmj.

This merge request was generated by a once off keep implemented in
https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/143774

This change was generated by
[gitlab-housekeeper](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/tree/master/gems/gitlab-housekeeper)
using the Keeps::BackfillDesiredShardingKeySmallTable keep.

To provide feedback on your experience with `gitlab-housekeeper` please comment in
<https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/442003>.

Changelog: other

## What does this MR do and why?

Add and backfill project_id for vulnerability_external_issue_links.

This table has a
[desired sharding key](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/development/database/multiple_databases.html#define-a-desired_sharding_key-to-automatically-backfill-a-sharding_key)
configured ([view configuration](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/master/db/docs/vulnerability_external_issue_links.yml)).

This merge request is the first step towards transforming the desired sharding key into a
[sharding key](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/development/database/multiple_databases.html#defining-a-sharding-key-for-all-cell-local-tables).

This involves three changes:

- Adding a new column that will serve as the sharding key (along with the relevant index and foreign key).
- Populating the sharding key when new records are created by adding a database function and trigger.
- Scheduling a [batched background migration](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/development/database/batched_background_migrations.html)
  to set the sharding key for existing records.

Once the background migration has completed, a second merge request will be created to finalize the background
migration and validate the not null constraint.

## How to verify

We have assigned a random backend engineer from ~"group::threat insights" to review these changes. Please review this merge
request from a ~backend perspective. The main thing we are looking to verify is that the added column and association
match the values specified by the [desired sharding key](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/master/db/docs/vulnerability_external_issue_links.yml)
configuration and that backfilling the column from this other table makes sense in the context of this feature.

When you are finished, please:

1. Trigger the [database testing pipeline](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/development/database/database_migration_pipeline.html)
   as instructed by Danger.
1. Request a review from the ~backend maintainer and ~database reviewer suggested by Danger.

If you have any questions or concerns, reach out to `@tigerwnz` or @manojmj.

This merge request was generated by a once off keep implemented in
https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/143774

This change was generated by
[gitlab-housekeeper](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/tree/master/gems/gitlab-housekeeper)
using the Keeps::BackfillDesiredShardingKeySmallTable keep.

To provide feedback on your experience with `gitlab-housekeeper` please comment in
<https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/442003>.

Changelog: other

Add and backfill project_id for packages_conan_metadata.

This table has a
[desired sharding key](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/development/database/multiple_databases.html#define-a-desired_sharding_key-to-automatically-backfill-a-sharding_key)
configured ([view configuration](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/master/db/docs/packages_conan_metadata.yml)).

This merge request is the first step towards transforming the desired sharding key into a
[sharding key](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/development/database/multiple_databases.html#defining-a-sharding-key-for-all-cell-local-tables).

This involves three changes:

- Adding a new column that will serve as the sharding key (along with the relevant index and foreign key).
- Populating the sharding key when new records are created by adding a database function and trigger.
- Scheduling a [batched background migration](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/development/database/batched_background_migrations.html)
  to set the sharding key for existing records.

Once the background migration has completed, a second merge request will be created to finalize the background
migration and validate the not null constraint.

We have assigned a random backend engineer from ~"group::package registry" to review these changes. Please review this merge
request from a ~backend perspective. The main thing we are looking to verify is that the added column and association
match the values specified by the [desired sharding key](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/master/db/docs/packages_conan_metadata.yml)
configuration and that backfilling the column from this other table makes sense in the context of this feature.

When you are finished, please:

1. Trigger the [database testing pipeline](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/development/database/database_migration_pipeline.html)
   as instructed by Danger.
1. Request a review from the ~backend maintainer and ~database reviewer suggested by Danger.

If you have any questions or concerns, reach out to `@tigerwnz` or @manojmj.

This merge request was generated by a once off keep implemented in
https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/143774

This change was generated by
[gitlab-housekeeper](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/tree/master/gems/gitlab-housekeeper)
using the Keeps::BackfillDesiredShardingKeySmallTable keep.

To provide feedback on your experience with `gitlab-housekeeper` please comment in
<https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/442003>.

Changelog: other

Enforce the use of ID-based URLs for Markdown uploads. Only legacy
uploads will be available on the path-based URLs.

Changelog: other

## What does this MR do and why?

Add and backfill project_id for packages_maven_metadata.

This table has a
[desired sharding key](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/development/database/multiple_databases.html#define-a-desired_sharding_key-to-automatically-backfill-a-sharding_key)
configured ([view configuration](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/master/db/docs/packages_maven_metadata.yml)).

This merge request is the first step towards transforming the desired sharding key into a
[sharding key](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/development/database/multiple_databases.html#defining-a-sharding-key-for-all-cell-local-tables).

This involves three changes:

- Adding a new column that will serve as the sharding key (along with the relevant index and foreign key).
- Populating the sharding key when new records are created by adding a database function and trigger.
- Scheduling a [batched background migration](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/development/database/batched_background_migrations.html)
  to set the sharding key for existing records.

Once the background migration has completed, a second merge request will be created to finalize the background
migration and validate the not null constraint.

## How to verify

We have assigned a random backend engineer from ~"group::package registry" to review these changes. Please review this merge
request from a ~backend perspective. The main thing we are looking to verify is that the added column and association
match the values specified by the [desired sharding key](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/master/db/docs/packages_maven_metadata.yml)
configuration and that backfilling the column from this other table makes sense in the context of this feature.

When you are finished, please:

1. Trigger the [database testing pipeline](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/development/database/database_migration_pipeline.html)
   as instructed by Danger.
1. Request a review from the ~backend maintainer and ~database reviewer suggested by Danger.

If you have any questions or concerns, reach out to `@tigerwnz` or @manojmj.

This merge request was generated by a once off keep implemented in
https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/143774

This change was generated by
[gitlab-housekeeper](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/tree/master/gems/gitlab-housekeeper)
using the Keeps::BackfillDesiredShardingKeySmallTable keep.

To provide feedback on your experience with `gitlab-housekeeper` please comment in
<https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/442003>.

Changelog: other

## What does this MR do and why?

Add and backfill project_id for vulnerability_finding_evidences.

This table has a
[desired sharding key](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/development/database/multiple_databases.html#define-a-desired_sharding_key-to-automatically-backfill-a-sharding_key)
configured ([view configuration](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/master/db/docs/vulnerability_finding_evidences.yml)).

This merge request is the first step towards transforming the desired sharding key into a
[sharding key](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/development/database/multiple_databases.html#defining-a-sharding-key-for-all-cell-local-tables).

This involves three changes:

- Adding a new column that will serve as the sharding key (along with the relevant index and foreign key).
- Populating the sharding key when new records are created by adding a database function and trigger.
- Scheduling a [batched background migration](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/development/database/batched_background_migrations.html)
  to set the sharding key for existing records.

Once the background migration has completed, a second merge request will be created to finalize the background
migration and validate the not null constraint.

## How to verify

We have assigned a random backend engineer from ~"group::threat insights" to review these changes. Please review this merge
request from a ~backend perspective. The main thing we are looking to verify is that the added column and association
match the values specified by the [desired sharding key](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/master/db/docs/vulnerability_finding_evidences.yml)
configuration and that backfilling the column from this other table makes sense in the context of this feature.

When you are finished, please:

1. Trigger the [database testing pipeline](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/development/database/database_migration_pipeline.html)
   as instructed by Danger.
1. Request a review from the ~backend maintainer and ~database reviewer suggested by Danger.

If you have any questions or concerns, reach out to `@tigerwnz` or @manojmj.

This merge request was generated by a once off keep implemented in
https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/143774

This change was generated by
[gitlab-housekeeper](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/tree/master/gems/gitlab-housekeeper)
using the Keeps::BackfillDesiredShardingKeySmallTable keep.

To provide feedback on your experience with `gitlab-housekeeper` please comment in
<https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/442003>.

Changelog: other

## What does this MR do and why?

Add and backfill project_id for merge_request_reviewers.

This table has a
[desired sharding key](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/development/database/multiple_databases.html#define-a-desired_sharding_key-to-automatically-backfill-a-sharding_key)
configured ([view configuration](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/master/db/docs/merge_request_reviewers.yml)).

This merge request is the first step towards transforming the desired sharding key into a
[sharding key](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/development/database/multiple_databases.html#defining-a-sharding-key-for-all-cell-local-tables).

This involves three changes:

- Adding a new column that will serve as the sharding key (along with the relevant index and foreign key).
- Populating the sharding key when new records are created by adding a database function and trigger.
- Scheduling a [batched background migration](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/development/database/batched_background_migrations.html)
  to set the sharding key for existing records.

Once the background migration has completed, a second merge request will be created to finalize the background
migration and validate the not null constraint.

## How to verify

We have assigned a random backend engineer from ~"group::code review" to review these changes. Please review this merge
request from a ~backend perspective. The main thing we are looking to verify is that the added column and association
match the values specified by the [desired sharding key](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/master/db/docs/merge_request_reviewers.yml)
configuration and that backfilling the column from this other table makes sense in the context of this feature.

When you are finished, please:

1. Trigger the [database testing pipeline](https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/development/database/database_migration_pipeline.html)
   as instructed by Danger.
1. Request a review from the ~backend maintainer and ~database reviewer suggested by Danger.

If you have any questions or concerns, reach out to `@tigerwnz` or @manojmj.

This merge request was generated by a once off keep implemented in
https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/143774

This change was generated by
[gitlab-housekeeper](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/tree/master/gems/gitlab-housekeeper)
using the Keeps::BackfillDesiredShardingKeySmallTable keep.

To provide feedback on your experience with `gitlab-housekeeper` please comment in
<https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/442003>.

Changelog: other

This reverts commit 950b9c64.

This is an experiment to see if this improves the performance of queries
fetching the parent namespace ID of a list of projects

See
https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/merge_requests/154899#note_1960804489.

[skip-db-structure-check]

- Allowing nil value for fields `minimum_access_level_for_delete`
and `minimum_access_level_for_push`
- Adding validation that ensures
  that at least one of the fields is present
- Adjusting Graphql API field types

Changelog: added

Add the cargo purl_type to the sbom enum and to package_metadata
sync.

Changelog: added

Adds disabled_direct_code_suggestions application setting which can be
used to disable direct connections to AI Gateway for code completions.

Changelog: added
EE: true

`organization_groups_projects_sort` will store the sorting option for
https://gitlab.com/-/organizations/<org-path>/groups_and_projects.

`organization_groups_projects_display` will store an enum with options
of projects, groups and combined.

Changelog: other

This removes the imported column from a number of tables. It was
added as part of work for 424454 but a change in the implementation
approach meant the column is no longer needed.

Changelog: other

This commit extends the snippets table
adding the organization_id column to support
Cells 1.0. It also provides an index to the
organization_id column and the corresponding
associations in models.

Changelog: added

Removes the tmp_index_project_statistics_updated_at temp index
from project_statistics that has been async removed in a separate
migration

Changelog: removed

Changelog: other

Changelog: other

This change adds the migration to create the index
and foreign key synchronously for approval_policy_rule_id.

Changelog: added

Changelog:changed

The column was never used and now can be safely removed,

Changelog: other